The Next Wave of SEP Monetization: From Smartphones to Connected Everything

The telecommunications landscape is undergoing a profound paradigm shift. For over a decade, the epicenter of Standard Essential Patent (SEP) monetization has been undeniably the smartphone. This single, high-volume device created a licensing ecosystem of unprecedented scale, where the value of cellular, video coding, and connectivity standards was realized and captured through a relatively consolidated supply chain. However, as the smartphone market matures and its growth plateaus, the engine of SEP value is decisively pivoting. The next frontier of monetization is not a single device, but a vast, heterogeneous, and rapidly expanding universe of "connected everything." This new era encompasses the Internet of Things (IoT), the connected automobile, the intelligent smart factory, and a new generation of consumer electronics. This transition is not merely a change in end-products; it represents a fundamental reconfiguration of licensing models, enforcement strategies, and the very definition of value for standard-essential innovation. The shift from a high-volume, low-SKU environment to a low-volume, high-SKU, multi-tiered ecosystem is forcing licensors and licensees alike to confront novel challenges, from the complexities of patent exhaustion and royalty stacking to the imperative for more flexible, value-based pricing models. This report will delve into the forces driving this transformation, analyze the strategic adaptations being forged by industry leaders, and provide a forward-looking analysis of the opportunities and hurdles that define the next wave of SEP monetization.

The Expanding Universe of SEP Applications

The gravitational center of SEP value is migrating, driven by the diminishing returns of a saturated smartphone market and the explosive potential of emerging technological sectors. The smartphone, once the singular star in the SEP firmament, is now just one among many celestial bodies in a rapidly expanding galaxy of connected devices. This transition is not an abstract projection but a tangible economic shift, underpinned by staggering growth forecasts and a fundamental reimagining of where and how connectivity creates value. The automotive industry, the sprawling Internet of Things, the data-driven environments of smart factories, and the feature-rich ecosystems of modern consumer electronics are no longer niche applications of cellular and wireless technology; they are becoming its primary domains. Each of these sectors presents a unique value proposition, a distinct supply chain structure, and, consequently, a novel set of challenges for the SEP licensing ecosystem. As patent owners seek new avenues for return on their substantial R&D investments in 5G and beyond, understanding the nuances of these new markets is paramount. This new landscape is characterized by its sheer scale and diversity, demanding a departure from the one-size-fits-all licensing approaches that dominated the smartphone era and paving the way for more sophisticated, segmented, and strategically nuanced monetization frameworks.

The automotive sector stands as a prime example of this profound shift, evolving from a purely mechanical domain into a sophisticated, software-defined platform on wheels. Connectivity is transitioning from a premium feature to a foundational utility, enabling everything from advanced navigation and infotainment to critical safety features and the promise of autonomous driving. This transformation is reflected in the market's projected growth, with the global automotive Internet of Things (IoT) market expected to surge from $37.20 billion in 2026 to $91.69 billion by 2034, exhibiting a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) that underscores the industry's rapid digitalization [46]. Another report values the market even higher, projecting a rise from USD 40 billion in 2024 to USD 110 billion by 2033, propelled by a 12.5% CAGR [49]. This exponential growth is directly tied to the increasing integration of cellular technologies, with 4G and now 5G becoming essential for vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication, over-the-air software updates, and a host of connected services that are reshaping the driver and passenger experience [4]. The licensing world has responded with innovative models designed to manage the complexity of the automotive supply chain. The Avanci platform, for instance, has emerged as a dominant force, offering one-stop licensing programs that bundle patents from numerous licensors into a single agreement for automakers. Its 5G Vehicle program, launched in 2023, provides a long-term license to essential 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G patent claims from over 75 licensors, streamlining what would otherwise be a prohibitively complex and fragmented licensing process for car manufacturers [0], [2], [5]. The success of this model is evidenced by high-profile license agreements with major automotive players like JLR and the Volvo Group, as well as the integration of new licensors like Lenovo and Quectel, demonstrating a growing consensus around this efficient, platform-based approach [1], [6], [9]. This move towards end-product licensing, facilitated by platforms like Avanci, represents a significant strategic adaptation, shifting the licensing conversation away from individual component suppliers to the original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) who realize the full value of the connected vehicle.

Beyond the automotive sector, the broader Internet of Things (IoT) presents an even more vast and fragmented opportunity for SEP monetization. The IoT ecosystem is characterized by an almost limitless variety of devices, from simple asset trackers and wearable health monitors to complex industrial sensors and smart home appliances. This diversity is a key driver of growth, with Ericsson forecasting that cellular IoT connections alone will approach 8 billion by the end of 2030 [78]. This staggering scale is attracting significant attention from major SEP holders, with companies like Nokia and Ericsson establishing dedicated IoT licensing programs designed to cater to this burgeoning market [60], [70]. However, the IoT landscape is not a monolith; it is a complex tapestry of different technologies, use cases, and economic models. Low-power, wide-area (LPWA) technologies like NB-IoT and LTE-M are specifically designed for devices that require long battery life and transmit small amounts of data, and they have their own distinct licensing considerations. Qualcomm, for example, offers a licensing program for IoT device makers with royalty rates tied to the module purchase price, acknowledging the cost-sensitive nature of many IoT products [16]. Similarly, patent pools like the Sisvel Cellular IoT program have emerged to provide efficient licensing for these specific technologies, offering rates as low as $0.08 per unit for NB-IoT products [18], [80]. The challenge in IoT lies not just in its scale, but in its heterogeneity. Licensing strategies must be flexible enough to accommodate a $10 sensor and a $1,000 industrial gateway, recognizing that the value of the connectivity technology, while essential, may represent a vastly different proportion of the overall product's value and functionality. This necessitates a move away from rigid, percentage-based royalties towards more nuanced models that can align with the economic realities of diverse IoT applications [15].

The industrial sector, particularly the concept of the smart factory or Industry 4.0, represents another critical frontier for SEP monetization. Here, connectivity is not about consumer convenience but about operational excellence, enabling real-time automation, predictive maintenance, and unprecedented levels of efficiency. Private 5G networks are the backbone of this transformation, offering the ultra-reliable, low-latency communication required to control robotic arms, autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs), and other critical machinery. The market for private 5G is poised for explosive growth, with projections indicating it could reach USD 24.67 billion by 2030, growing at a remarkable 43% CAGR from 2025 [157]. IoT Analytics forecasts an even steeper trajectory, with 5G IoT connections growing at a 59% CAGR from 2024 to 2030 to reach over 800 million connections, a significant portion of which will be in industrial settings [150]. Industrial giants like Siemens are at the forefront of this revolution, not only as implementers of the technology but also as significant patent holders. Siemens is actively scaling up its private 5G infrastructure solutions and forming partnerships, such as with NEC, to accelerate the deployment of smart factories [143], [28]. The company submitted around 5,300 invention disclosures worldwide in fiscal 2024, highlighting its robust innovation pipeline in areas like industrial automation and manufacturing [166]. The licensing landscape in this sector is still nascent, presenting a significant, relatively untapped potential for SEP holders [160], [169]. The key question is who will bear the licensing responsibility: the industrial OEM like Siemens deploying the private network, the enterprise using the network, or the chipset vendors supplying the components. This ambiguity creates both a challenge and an opportunity for SEP owners to define new licensing norms for this critical sector.

Finally, the realm of consumer electronics continues to be a vital domain for SEP monetization, but the nature of the essential technologies is evolving. While cellular connectivity remains important for devices like tablets and wearables, the primary drivers of SEP value in this segment are increasingly video coding standards like HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding) and its successor VVC (Versatile Video Coding), as well as next-generation Wi-Fi standards like Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7. The demand for high-resolution, 4K, and eventually 8K video streaming has made HEVC the de facto codec, integrated into virtually all smart TVs and OTT devices by 2025 [110], [111]. This has led to a mature but complex licensing environment dominated by patent pools. Access Advance and Via Licensing Alliance (which was acquired by Access Advance in late 2025) are the key players managing the HEVC and VVC patent pools, offering licenses for the thousands of patents essential to these standards [101], [104], [112]. These pools have reported significant growth, with Access Advance welcoming 29 new HEVC licensees in a single quarter and achieving a 100% renewal rate, indicating strong market adoption of their licensing frameworks [105], [113]. Similarly, Wi-Fi 6 has become ubiquitous in a wide array of consumer devices, from smartphones and laptops to smart home gadgets and medical devices, creating a substantial licensing market estimated to be worth around $10 billion [130], [137]. Sisvel's Wi-Fi 6 patent pool, which includes major contributors like Huawei, has become a central licensing mechanism for this technology, offering rates as low as $0.50 per unit for consumer devices [131], [132]. The consumer electronics sector thus illustrates the broadening of the SEP landscape beyond cellular, highlighting the critical importance of video and wireless connectivity standards in the connected everything era and the continued reliance on patent pools to manage the complexity of licensing these ubiquitous technologies.

The Evolution of Licensing Models and Enforcement Strategies

The seismic shift from a smartphone-centric world to a diverse ecosystem of connected everything is not only redefining the where of SEP monetization but is fundamentally revolutionizing the how. The traditional licensing models and enforcement strategies, honed over years in the relatively homogenous smartphone market, are proving inadequate for the complexities of the IoT, automotive, and industrial domains. In response, the IP ecosystem is undergoing a period of rapid innovation, marked by the rise of sophisticated one-stop-shop platforms, a critical re-evaluation of where licensing should occur in multi-tiered value chains, and the development of novel, more flexible pricing structures designed to align with the economic realities of new implementers. This evolution is a strategic imperative, driven by the need to reduce transaction costs, manage legal uncertainties, and ultimately, to create sustainable frameworks that incentivize innovation by both patent owners and implementers. The most successful players in this new era will be those who can move beyond rigid, legacy approaches and embrace a more adaptive, collaborative, and nuanced vision of SEP licensing, one that is capable of capturing and distributing value fairly across an increasingly fragmented and technologically diverse global landscape.

One of the most significant developments in the new SEP landscape is the ascendance of joint licensing solutions, epitomized by platforms like Avanci. The traditional model of bilateral licensing, where each implementer negotiates separate licenses with dozens of different patent holders, becomes exponentially more cumbersome and inefficient as the number of connected devices and their diversity multiplies. For an automaker, the prospect of negotiating with over 75 different licensors for cellular connectivity alone would be a legal and logistical nightmare. Avanci directly addresses this "gridlock of complexity" by aggregating patents from numerous licensors into a single, portfolio license. Its 5G Vehicle program, for instance, offers automakers a one-stop license covering 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G technologies, dramatically simplifying the licensing process and providing legal certainty [0], [5]. This model is not limited to automotive; Avanci has also launched a 5G platform for the broader Internet of Things, recognizing the same need for efficiency in that vast and fragmented market [3]. The success of these platforms is evident in their rapid adoption. By mid-2025, Avanci's 5G Vehicle program had signed on major OEMs like JLR and the Volvo Group, and its licensor base had grown to include over 75 patent holders, including industry heavyweights like Lenovo and Quectel [1], [2], [6], [9]. Similarly, patent pools for specific technologies like Sisvel's Cellular IoT and Wi-Fi 6 pools, and Access Advance's HEVC/VVC pools, are built on the same principle of aggregation and efficiency [18], [80], [112], [130]. Research indicates that both patent owners and implementers see value in these pools, with owners emphasizing revenue-sharing mechanisms and implementers focusing on predictable royalty rates and reduced legal risk [88]. This trend towards platform-based licensing represents a fundamental strategic shift, moving away from a patchwork of bilateral deals towards a more streamlined, scalable, and predictable model that is better suited for the "connected everything" era.

However, the rise of these platforms also brings to the fore one of the most contentious legal issues in modern SEP licensing: determining the correct level within the value chain at which licensing should occur. This is the core of the component-level vs. end-product licensing debate. In the smartphone era, licensing largely occurred at the chipset or handset manufacturer level. But in industries like automotive, the supply chain is far more complex, with multiple tiers of suppliers. A decision by a German court in the landmark Daimler case, which was later referenced in other disputes, highlighted the friction this creates. Some SEP holders prefer to license at the component level (e.g., the telematics control unit), arguing this is where the patented technology is first implemented. However, many OEMs and industry analysts argue that licensing at the end-product level is more efficient and aligns with where the ultimate value of the standardized technology is realized [31]. This debate is inextricably linked to the doctrine of patent exhaustion, which posits that a patent owner's rights to control a patented product are exhausted after the first authorized sale. The Munich Local Division of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) has already begun to weigh in on these complex issues, for instance, holding that Huawei's rights under a patent were exhausted due to a prior license agreement with Qualcomm [30]. Such decisions will have profound implications for licensing strategies. If component-level sales exhaust patent rights, it will strengthen the hand of end-product implementers and push licensing further up the supply chain. Conversely, if courts find that exhaustion does not apply to complex, multi-component products, it could preserve the right of patent owners to license at any level. The emergence of the UPC as a central forum for these disputes adds a new layer of both opportunity and complexity, as its decisions will shape the European SEP landscape for years to come [99].

Beyond the structural shifts in who licenses with whom, the very nature of how royalties are calculated is undergoing a critical transformation. The traditional percentage-of-selling-price model, which worked reasonably well for high-priced smartphones, is poorly suited for the IoT world, where the end-product can be a low-cost sensor with a tiny margin. Applying a percentage-based royalty to such a device could easily consume the entire profit margin, making it economically unviable. Recognizing this, SEP holders are increasingly adopting alternative pricing models. Per-unit royalties, often with tiered or capped rates, are becoming far more common. For example, Sisvel's Wi-Fi 6 pool offers a flat rate of $0.50 per unit for consumer devices, providing cost certainty for implementers [130]. Similarly, its Cellular IoT pool offers rates as low as $0.08 per unit for NB-IoT products [18]. Qualcomm has also adopted a hybrid approach for its IoT licensing program, offering a royalty that is either a percentage of the module purchase price or a small per-unit fee with a minimum, providing flexibility for different types of IoT devices [16]. This evolution towards per-unit and hybrid models is a pragmatic response to the economic realities of the new implementer markets. It reflects a growing consensus, supported by academic and policy arguments, that FRAND royalties should be more closely tied to the actual economic value contributed by the standardized technology, rather than being a disproportionate share of the end-product's price [15], [84], [39]. This shift is crucial for fostering the widespread adoption of connected technologies, ensuring that royalty obligations do not stifle innovation in price-sensitive markets.

Challenges and Opportunities on the New Frontier

As the SEP monetization wave expands into the diverse territories of IoT, automotive, and industrial applications, it encounters a new set of formidable challenges and, concurrently, unprecedented opportunities. The path to sustainable licensing models in these nascent markets is fraught with legal, economic, and technical complexities that did not exist, or were far less pronounced, in the smartphone era. The specter of royalty stacking, the ambiguities surrounding patent exhaustion in complex supply chains, and the difficulties of enforcing rights against a myriad of new, often legally inexperienced, implementers create a landscape of significant uncertainty. Yet, these challenges are counterbalanced by immense opportunities: the chance to tap into vast, largely untapped markets, to forge new strategic partnerships with non-traditional players, and to define the licensing frameworks that will govern the next generation of technological innovation. Successfully navigating this new frontier will require more than just legal acumen; it will demand strategic foresight, a willingness to innovate in business models, and a collaborative approach to building an ecosystem that can balance the legitimate rights of innovators with the imperative for broad, affordable technology deployment.

One of the most significant and frequently cited challenges in the "connected everything" era is the problem of royalty stacking. Unlike a smartphone, which primarily incorporates a few key connectivity standards (e.g., cellular, Wi-Fi, video coding), a complex IoT device or a connected vehicle may incorporate dozens of different standardized technologies, each with its own pool of SEP holders demanding a royalty. If each licensor were to claim a small percentage of the end-product's price, the cumulative royalty burden could quickly become unsustainable, potentially exceeding the total cost of the device or erasing all profit margins for the implementer. This is not merely a theoretical concern; it is a fundamental barrier to the adoption of interconnected technologies. Academic literature and policy discussions have long highlighted this risk, with some scholars advocating for aggregate royalty stacking caps to ensure that cumulative licensing fees remain within FRAND bounds [85], [89]. The fear of "royalty stacking" is a major driver behind the push for one-stop licensing platforms like Avanci and patent pools for technologies like Wi-Fi 6 and HEVC. By aggregating patents from multiple owners, these platforms can offer a single, capped royalty rate, thereby providing implementers with cost predictability and mitigating the risk of an unmanageable stack of royalties [118]. However, these pools are not a panacea. The effectiveness of a pool depends on its comprehensiveness; if key patent holders choose not to join, implementers may still face the threat of litigation from outside the pool, leading to a "partial pool" problem. Furthermore, determining the "right" aggregate royalty for a complex product like a smart factory, where the value of connectivity is intertwined with proprietary industrial software and hardware, is an extraordinarily difficult task. Addressing the challenge of royalty stacking will require continued innovation in licensing structures, greater transparency from patent owners, and potentially, new policy or judicial guidance on what constitutes a reasonable aggregate royalty burden for multi-standard products.

The legal and enforcement landscape presents another layer of profound complexity. The doctrine of patent exhaustion, which limits a patent owner's control over a product after an authorized sale, becomes particularly murky in multi-tiered global supply chains [98]. If a chipset maker sells a licensed component to a tier-one supplier, who then integrates it into a module for an automotive OEM, are the patent owner's rights exhausted with respect to the final car? Different jurisdictions have historically taken different approaches to this question, and the emergence of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in Europe adds a new, powerful adjudicator to the mix. Early decisions from the UPC, such as the one involving Huawei and Qualcomm, indicate that the court is willing to tackle these complex issues head-on [30]. The UPC's approach to exhaustion and FRAND will be closely watched by the global IP community, as its decisions could set precedents that reshape licensing strategies worldwide [95]. Beyond legal doctrines, the practical challenges of enforcement are immense. In the smartphone world, licensors were dealing with a relatively small number of sophisticated, legally seasoned companies. In the IoT world, the opposite is often true. There are millions of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that may lack the legal resources or expertise to navigate complex SEP licensing negotiations. This creates a dilemma for licensors: pursuing litigation against numerous small companies is economically unviable and can generate significant negative publicity, while ignoring widespread infringement undermines the value of their patent portfolios. This dynamic is creating an opportunity for new intermediaries and service providers who can offer streamlined licensing solutions, education, and support for these new implementers, helping to bridge the gap between the world of high-stakes IP litigation and the practical realities of the IoT economy.

Despite these challenges, the new frontier of SEP monetization is brimming with strategic opportunities. The most obvious is the sheer untapped economic potential of markets like industrial IoT and smart factories. While automotive and consumer electronics are seeing significant licensing activity, the industrial sector remains a relatively greenfield territory [160], [169]. Companies like Siemens, with deep roots in industrial automation, are not just building smart factories; they are also building substantial patent portfolios that cover the intersection of industrial software, AI, and 5G connectivity [25], [166]. This creates a unique opportunity for cross-industry partnerships and novel licensing models. A traditional telecom SEP holder could partner with an industrial giant like Siemens to offer a bundled licensing solution for private 5G networks, combining telecom patents with Siemens's industrial IP and implementation expertise. This would create immense value for end-customers and provide a clear, efficient licensing path. Another major opportunity lies in the growth of data monetization, particularly in the automotive sector. As vehicles become increasingly connected, they generate vast amounts of data on driving behavior, vehicle health, and road conditions. The market for automotive data monetization is projected to be substantial, with one report valuing it at USD 7.8 billion in 2024 [43], [45]. While SEPs themselves may not directly cover the data, the connectivity they enable is the foundational layer upon which all data-driven services are built. This creates a powerful argument for valuing SEPs not just on their technical function, but on their ability to enable entirely new, high-value business models. SEP holders can leverage this by structuring licensing deals that perhaps include a share of future data revenues or by aligning their royalty demands with the value of the data services their technology makes possible.

Finally, the entire SEP ecosystem is operating within an evolving global policy and regulatory environment. There is a growing international dialogue, spearheaded by organizations like the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), about the need for greater transparency and efficiency in SEP licensing [33]. The European Commission has also been active in this space, exploring potential regulatory interventions to improve the functioning of SEP markets. While some proposed regulations have been met with concern from patent owners who fear they may devalue SEPs and reduce innovation incentives [83], the broader trend is towards a call for more clarity on SEP ownership, essentiality, and FRAND terms [86]. This push for transparency and the emergence of the UPC as a central enforcement forum in Europe are creating a dynamic of "jurisdictional competition," where different regions are vying to become the preferred venue for SEP disputes and licensing [37], [81]. While this can create short-term uncertainty, it can also drive positive change by encouraging jurisdictions to develop more efficient, predictable, and balanced legal frameworks for SEP enforcement. For SEP owners and implementers alike, navigating this evolving policy landscape will be a key strategic challenge, requiring active engagement with policymakers and a proactive approach to compliance and best practices.

Conclusion: Navigating the Future of SEP Value

The great migration of SEP value from the concentrated shores of the smartphone market to the sprawling, diverse continents of connected everything is undeniable and irreversible. This transition marks the end of an era defined by a single, dominant device and the beginning of a more complex, fragmented, and ultimately more expansive epoch for innovation and intellectual property. The forces driving this shift—the maturation of the smartphone market and the explosive growth of IoT, automotive, and industrial applications—are reshaping the very foundations of SEP monetization. The old playbooks, built on bilateral negotiations with a handful of powerful licensees and standardized percentage-based royalty models, are increasingly obsolete. In their place, a new paradigm is emerging, characterized by platform-based licensing, multi-tiered value chain negotiations, and flexible, value-driven pricing. This new world is not without its perils; the challenges of royalty stacking, patent exhaustion, and enforcement against a diffuse array of new implementers are significant and require sophisticated, multi-pronged solutions. However, for those who can navigate these complexities, the opportunities are immense, promising access to new, multi-billion-dollar markets and the chance to architect the licensing frameworks that will underpin the next technological revolution.

The successful SEP monetizer of the future will be a strategic architect, not merely a legal enforcer. Their success will hinge on their ability to adopt a segmented approach, recognizing that a strategy suitable for high-margin automotive infotainment systems is entirely inappropriate for cost-sensitive industrial sensors. This will necessitate a deep understanding of the economic realities and value drivers of each target market, from the data monetization potential of connected cars to the operational efficiency gains of smart factories. It will require a willingness to embrace new business models, from participating in or creating joint licensing platforms like Avanci to forging unconventional partnerships with industrial incumbents like Siemens. The focus must shift from simply extracting a royalty based on a product's price to collaboratively defining and capturing a fair share of the value that standardized technology creates. This means aligning licensing terms with the economic benefits realized by the implementer, whether those benefits are measured in new service revenues, enhanced productivity, or enriched user experiences.

Looking ahead, the horizon is already showing the contours of the next challenges and opportunities. The development of 6G, with its promise of integrated sensing, AI, and extreme connectivity, will further blur the lines between the digital and physical worlds, creating yet more complex licensing scenarios [72]. The integration of artificial intelligence and edge computing into IoT devices will raise novel questions about what constitutes a "standard" and how patent rights should be apportioned in systems that learn and adapt [51]. Furthermore, the global policy landscape will continue to evolve, with ongoing debates around transparency, FRAND, and the role of regulation in ensuring a balanced innovation ecosystem. In this dynamic environment, adaptability, foresight, and a commitment to building sustainable, win-win relationships will be the most valuable assets. The next wave of SEP monetization is not just about licensing patents; it's about enabling a connected future. Those who understand this fundamental truth will be best positioned to thrive in the exciting and transformative era ahead.

References

[0] Avanci 5G Vehicle. https://www.avanci.com/vehicle/5gvehicle.

[1] Avanci announces 5G Vehicle license agreement with JLR. https://www.avanci.com/2025/04/07/avanci-announces-5g-vehicle-license-agreement-with-jlr.

[2] Quectel Joins Avanci 5G Vehicle as a Licensor. https://www.avanci.com/2025/07/17/quectel-joins-avanci-5g-vehicle-as-a-licensor.

[3] Avanci Launches 5g Licensing Platform For The Internet Of. https://www.avanci.com/2020/07/29/avanci-launches-5g-licensing-platform-for-the-internet-of-things.

[4] Avanci Launches 5G Connected Vehicle Licensing Program. https://www.avanci.com/2023/08/16/avanci-launches-5g-connected-vehicle-licensing-program.

[5] Avanci Vehicle. https://www.avanci.com/vehicle.

[6] Lenovo, Quectel join Avanci 5G as licensors. https://ipfray.com/lenovo-quectel-join-avanci-5g-as-licensors-225-million-vehicles-now-connected-through-avanci-vehicle.

[7] Avanci launches 5G standard-essential patent licensing. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=91d2b96d-0310-4f7e-95bd-b2b5b779a7b6.

[8] Avanci launches 5G automotive licensing programme. https://www.juve-patent.com/people-and-business/avanci-launches-5g-automotive-licensing-programme.

[9] Volvo Group signs 5G Vehicle license with Avanci. https://www.avanci.com/2025/04/15/volvo-group-signs-5g-vehicle-license-with-avanci.

[10] Empirical data on average SEP royalty rates from 2012 to. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/empirical-data-average-sep-royalty-rates-from-2012-2023-eric-stasik-yynie.

[11] The global SEP landscape. https://media.crai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/24141126/Royalty-Flows-Germany-Final-Report.pdf.

[12] SEP Licensing Level in Value Chains with Emphasis on. https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/download/414/415/2160.

[13] Cellular IOT patents: navigating a complex SEP licensing. https://www.iam-media.com/article/cellular-iot-patents-navigating-complex-sep-licensing-landscape.

[14] Publications. https://www.wiseharbor.com/publications.

[15] A New Approach to FRAND Royalty Determination in IoT. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-024-01499-9.

[16] Qualcomm publishes cellular IoT SEP royalties based on. https://ipfray.com/qualcomm-publishes-cellular-iot-sep-royalties-based-on-module-price-but-also-available-to-device-makers.

[17] Articles. http://www.unified-consulting.com/articles.

[18] The Sisvel and Nordic Semiconductor cellular IoT deal is a. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/the-sisvel-and-nordic-semiconductor-cellular-iot-deal-is-a-big-win-win.

[19] Decoding SEP Licensing: A Comprehensive Guide for. https://actonline.org/2024/05/09/decoding-sep-licensing-a-comprehensive-guide-for-the-iot-and-ai-revolutions.

[20] SEP Licensing Opportunities in Southeast Asia's Growing. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2025/sep-licensing-opportunities-in-southeast-asias-growing-industrial-iot-market.

[21] SPS 2025: Positioning for Industrial Automation's Future. https://iot-analytics.com/industrial-automation-future-siemens-beckhoff-rockwell-abb-sps-2025.

[22] Siemens at the SPS fair 2025. https://press.siemens.com/global/en/feature/siemens-sps-fair-2025.

[23] Siemens Unveils Unified Manufacturing Solution for. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ramachandra-kutty-7bba611_unlock-integrated-manufacturing-excellence-activity-7417782483066359808-7fCO.

[24] Siemens, FMM formalise partnership to fast-track smart. https://www.digitalnewsasia.com/business/siemens-fmm-formalise-partnership-fast-track-smart-manufacturing-selangor-techsphere-summit.

[25] Inside Siemens' Patent Strategy: Filings, Litigation Trends, and. https://greyb.com/blog/siemens-patent-strategy-2025.

[26] ONE Tech - Presentation Roland Busch, CEO of Siemens AG. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:8687580a-ad6c-4302-8a90-1478c77dedb7/ONE-Tech-Presentation-Roland-Busch-CEO.pdf.

[27] Review Ten industrial software towards smart manufacturing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0278612525000196.

[28] NEC and Siemens collaborate to accelerate smart factory. https://www.nec.com/en/press/202511/global_20251104_01.html.

[29] Siemens NX Gets Big Update in 2025. https://engtechnica.com/siemens-nx-gets-big-update-in-2025.

[30] Why 2024 was pivotal for SEPs in Europe. https://www.taylorwessing.com/en/insights-and-events/insights/2025/01/why-2024-was-pivotal.

[31] 8. Internet of things and licensing: SEPs and FRAND. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781035308606/chapter8.pdf.

[32] SEP Licensing Level in Value Chains with Emphasis on IoT and. https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/414?articlesBySimilarityPage=3.

[33] WIPO Strategy on Standard Essential Patents 2024–2026. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-rn2024-12-en-strategy-on-standard-essential-patents-2024-2026.pdf.

[34] How the Internet of Things Will Change Patent Licensing. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4810962.

[35] Patents in Telecoms and the Internet of Things 2024. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/events/2024/may/patents-telecoms-and-internet-things-2024.

[36] FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape. https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20240424-frand-quarterly-navigating-the-global-sep-landscape-april-2024.

[37] Jurisdictional Competition on Standard-Essential Patents. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/jurisdictional-competition-on-standard-essential-patents.

[38] Paris Local Division. https://www.unifiedpatentcourt.org/en/upc-cms/document-download?file=PDF%20PO%20ORDER%20362.pdf&did=68d01367a6c775ee2eb21f23&fid=15fe97a2-d8a0-4682-b2db-30554472c587&int=423f38dc89133988edd90101fa50cc8e1dd44c30a4e0a010bf428d66d551c244.

[39] A New Approach to FRAND Royalty Determination in IoT. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-024-01499-9.

[40] 2024 Trends to Watch: IoT - Omdia - Informa. https://omdia.tech.informa.com/om033870/2024-trends-to-watch-iot.

[41] Top Automotive Trends for 2024. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/5181163.

[42] The global SEP landscape. https://media.crai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/24141126/Royalty-Flows-Germany-Final-Report.pdf.

[43] Automotive Data Monetization: Trends & Examples 2025. https://www.monda.ai/blog/automotive-data-monetization.

[44] Automotive Data Monetization Trends 2024-2030. https://store.frost.com/ecosystem-activity-for-automotive-data-monetization-2024-2030.html.

[45] Connected Services in Automotive: Monetization. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/connected-services-automotive-monetization-challenges-h%C3%A4usler-2laif.

[46] Automotive Internet of Things Market | Industry Report, 2034. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/automotive-internet-of-things-iot-market-114638.

[47] Who is Leading the 5G Patent Race?. https://www.lexisnexisip.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025-LexisNexis-5G-SEP-Report.pdf?hsCtaAttrib=185191375501.

[48] Decoding SEP Licensing: IoT and the Future of. https://actonline.org/2024/06/03/decoding-sep-licensing-iot-and-the-future-of-sustainable-technology.

[49] IoT In Automotive Market Surges to USD 110 Billion. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/iot-in-automotive-market-surges-to-usd-110-billion-by-2033--propelled-by-12-5-cagr---verified-market-reports-302563064.html.

[50] Qualcomm's cellular IoT licensing program. https://www.qualcomm.com/licensing/cellular-iot-licensing-program.

[51] Overview of Qualcomm IoT and Edge AI: Embedded World. https://www.qualcomm.com/developer/blog/2025/05/qualcomm-iot-edge-ai-overview-embedded-world-2025.

[52] Huawei, Qualcomm, LG Electronics lead cellular IoT patent. https://ipfray.com/huawei-qualcomm-lg-electronics-lead-cellular-iot-patent-race-new-lexisnexis-report.

[53] Regional ecosystem enablement. https://www.qualcomm.com/company/corporate-responsibility/empowering-digital-transformation/ecosystem-enablement.

[54] Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Earnings. https://s204.q4cdn.com/645488518/files/doc_financials/2025/q4/FY2025-4th-Quarter-Earnings-Presentation_11-5-25_final.pdf.

[55] Cellular IoT Report. https://www.lexisnexisip.com/cellular-iot-report.

[56] The shift from IoT to autonomous connected operations. https://iot-analytics.com/state-of-enterprise-iot-from-iot-autonomous-connected-operations.

[57] what am i missing with qualcomm? $qCOM at its lowest. https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1qr5gb5/what_am_i_missing_with_qualcomm_qcom_at_its.

[58] Qualcomm Highlights Edge AI Innovation at. https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/qualcomm-highlights-edge-ai-innovation-at-qualcomm-ai-program-for-innovators-qaipi-2025--apac-demo-day-and-sets-the-stage-for-2026-302635154.html.

[59] Industrial & Embedded IoT Track | Partner Network. https://www.qualcomm.com/support/partner/iot.

[60] Patent licensing for IoT I Nokia. https://www.nokia.com/licensing/patents/IoT.

[61] Licensing Nokia's wireless innovation. https://www.nokia.com/blog/licensing-nokias-wireless-innovation.

[62] First impressions on Nokia's Technology Standards business. https://www.nokia.com/blog/first-impressions-on-nokias-technology-standards-business.

[63] Nokia strikes another patent license deal (renewal) with. https://ipfray.com/nokia-strikes-another-patent-license-deal-renewal-with-samsung-first-5g-now-video-technologies-implemented-in-tvs.

[64] Nokia's Lukander steps down; C-IoT royalty truths; Nordics. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/nokias-lukander-steps-down-c-iot-royalty-truths-nordics-report-quarterly.

[65] Patent licensing. https://www.nokia.com/licensing/patents.

[66] Nokia names new president of IP department. https://www.juve-patent.com/people-and-business/nokia-names-new-president-of-ip-department-nokia-technologies.

[67] Nokia.com | Susanna Martikainen. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/susannamartikainen_licensing-nokias-wireless-innovation-nokiacom-activity-7337738606389702657-uQ0s.

[68] IoT SEP Negotiations: New Players in a Complicated Game. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/iot-sep-negotiations-new-players-in-a-7723140.

[69] Nokia and Ericsson executives shine light on video. https://www.iam-media.com/article/nokia-and-ericsson-executives-shine-light-video-streaming-licensing-strategies.

[70] Learn more about our IoT licensing program Ericsson's. https://www.ericsson.com/en/patents/our-licensing-programs/cellular-internet-of-things-iot.

[71] Ericsson Licensing Programs - Patents. https://www.ericsson.com/en/patents/our-licensing-programs.

[72] 2024 - Internet of Things and more!. https://www.ericsson.com/en/about-us/history/company/timeline-placeholder/timeline-2024-internet-of-things-and-more.

[73] Ericsson adopting new approach for video and IoT deal. https://www.iam-media.com/article/ericsson-adopting-new-approach-video-and-iot-licensing-says-roy-maharaj.

[74] Ericsson's Q2 results show the importance of our patents. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ericssons-q2-results-show-importance-our-patents-christina-petersson-mly6f.

[75] Why licensed spectrum matters in private networks for IoT. https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/north-america/2024/spectrum-for-industry-40.

[76] For Ericsson, 'Massive' IoT means massive opportunity. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/for-ericsson-massive-iot-means-massive-opportunity.

[77] Unlocking scalable and efficient 5G IoT connectivity - RedCap. https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2024/12/redcap-unlocking-scalable-and-efficient-5g-iot-connectivity-for-the-enterprise.

[78] IoT connections outlook - Ericsson Mobility Report. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/mobility-report/dataforecasts/iot-connections-outlook.

[79] Capturing the Full Potential of Automotive IoT - Ericsson. https://experiences.ericsson.net/internal-cvm/automotive-iot.

[80] Cellular IoT patent royalties: a closer look. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/cellular-iot-patent-royalties-a-closer-look.

[81] Jurisdictional Competition on Standard-Essential Patents. https://jipel.law.nyu.edu/jurisdictional-competition-on-standard-essential-patents.

[82] Decoding SEP Licensing: A Comprehensive Guide for. https://actonline.org/2024/05/09/decoding-sep-licensing-a-comprehensive-guide-for-the-iot-and-ai-revolutions.

[83] View of Devaluing SEPs: Hold-up bias and side effects. https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/398/391.

[84] A New Approach to FRAND Royalty Determination in IoT. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-024-01499-9.

[85] SEPs-Expert-Group-Contribution-to-the-Debate-on-. https://preubohlig.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/SEPs-Expert-Group-Contribution-to-the-Debate-on-SEPs.pdf.

[86] Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation. https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/73/7/647/7689133.

[87] Inherent Hold-Up Value, Market Power, and Supra-FRAND. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/antitrust/source/2024/october/inherent-hold-up-value.pdf.

[88] What Makes Patent Pools Successful? Evidence from. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/4738162.pdf?abstractid=4738162.

[89] Standard-Essential Patents and the Internet of Things. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/2/38360.pdf.

[90] UPC's Munich LD contradicts EU Commission, separately. https://ipfray.com/upcs-munich-ld-contradicts-eu-commission-separately-faults-netgear-for-unsubstantiated-rejection-of-sisvels-wifi-6-pool-license-offer.

[91] Local Division Mannheim UPC_CFI_159/2024. https://www.unifiedpatentcourt.org/sites/default/files/files/api_order/E8CC59F32078C1F6A1F190566F209298_en.pdf.

[92] Untapping Patents to Promote a European Right to Repair. https://academic.oup.com/grurint/article/74/12/1113/8339903.

[93] First UPC decision to tackle infringement and validity of. https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2025/05/first-upc-decision-to-tackle.html.

[94] The IP Brief - November 2024. https://www.slaughterandmay.com/insights/ip-brief/the-ip-brief-november-2024.

[95] Key Insights From the UPC's First SEP Decision. https://www.fr.com/insights/thought-leadership/blogs/key-insights-from-the-upcs-first-sep.

[96] Federal Circuit Slices Through Patent Infringement Verdict. https://patentlyo.com/patent/2024/10/federal-infringement-apportionment.html.

[97] UPC Unfiltered, by Willem Hoyng – UPC decisions week. https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/detail/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-11-2025.

[98] The U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Exhaustion. https://lesi.org/the-u-s-supreme-court-clarifies-patent-exhaustion.

[99] Unified Patent Court Review 2023-2024. https://www.bristows.com/app/uploads/2025/12/Unified-Patent-Court-Review-2023-2024.pdf.

[100] HEVC/VVC. https://via-la.com/licensing-programs/hevc-vvc.

[101] Access Advance and Via Licensing Alliance Announce. https://accessadvance.com/2025/12/15/access-advance-and-via-licensing-alliance-announce-hevc-vvc-program-acquisition.

[102] News. https://via-la.com/news.

[103] Access Advance Extends HEVC Advance Rate Increase. https://www.afp.com/en/infos/access-advance-extends-hevc-advance-rate-increase-deadline.

[104] Access Advance acquires Via Licensing Alliance's HEVC. https://ipfray.com/breaking-access-advance-acquires-via-licensing-alliances-hevc-vvc-patent-pools.

[105] Access Advance Closes 2025 with Record Quarter. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260121430948/en/Access-Advance-Closes-2025-with-Record-Quarter-Eight-Major-Licensees-100-Renewal-Rate-Litigations-Resolved.

[106] Via Licensing Alliance: Home. https://via-la.com.

[107] Access Advance and Via Licensing Alliance Announce. https://www.accessnewswire.com/newsroom/en/electronics-and-engineering/access-advance-and-via-licensing-alliance-announce-hevc%2Fvvc-program-acq-1117638.

[108] Via LA and Microsoft settle dispute over video coding. https://www.juve-patent.com/cases/via-la-and-microsoft-settle-dispute-over-video-coding-technology.

[109] Eight Major Licensees, 100% Renewal Rate, Litigations. https://accessadvance.com/2026/01/22/access-advance-closes-2025-with-record-quarter-eight-major-licensees-100-renewal-rate-litigations-resolved.

[110] HEVC Licensing: Misunderstood, Maligned, and. https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/hevc-licensing-misunderstood-maligned-and-surprisingly-successful.html.

[111] HEVC Licensing: Misunderstood, Maligned, and Incredibly. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/hevc-licensing-misunderstood-maligned-incredibly-successful-jan-ozer-p0eec.

[112] HEVC/VVC. https://via-la.com/licensing-programs/hevc-vvc.

[113] Access Advance reports 100% HEVC patent agreement. https://ipfray.com/access-advance-reports-100-hevc-patent-agreement-renewal-rate-google-among-licensees-that-opted-to-extend.

[114] Video coding litigation in the USA: Key insights & trends (2020. https://greyb.com/blog/video-coding-litigation-trends-2020-2025.

[115] A Proposed New Framework for Licensing of SEPs by. https://accessadvance.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2023.07.30-China-SAMR-anti-monopoly-guidelines-on-SEPs-Proposed-New-Framework-for-Licensing-of-SEPs.pdf.

[116] Digital marketing of standard essential patent licensing. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219025000523.

[117] Clarity needed for complex video-codec patent landscape. https://www.lexisnexisip.com/resources/decoding-video-codec-patent-landscape.

[118] Access Advance's Video Distribution Patent Pool. https://parolaanalytics.com/blog/access-advance-video-patent-pool.

[119] Will Hulu Jump to VVC (H.266) Before 8K? A 2025 Codec. https://www.simalabs.ai/resources/hulu-vvc-h266-8k-codec-roadmap-2025-ai-savings.

[120] HEVC Advance Patent Pool: Royalties. https://accessadvance.com/topic-where-and-when-is-a-royalty-due.

[121] Access Advance: Home. https://accessadvance.com.

[122] HEVC Advance Patent Pool. https://accessadvance.com/hevc-advance-patent-pool-detailed-royalty-rates.

[123] Access Advance Reveals Royalty Rates for Video Streaming. https://www.streamingmediaglobal.com/Articles/News/Featured-News/Access-Advance-Reveals-Royalty-Rates-for-Video-Streaming-Services-170331.aspx.

[124] HEVC Advance. https://accessadvance.com/licensing-programs/hevc-advance.

[125] HEVC Licensing: Misunderstood, Maligned, and. https://streaminglearningcenter.com/codecs/hevc-licensing-misunderstood-maligned-and-surprisingly-successful.html.

[126] Explanation of the Fairness and Reasonableness. https://accessadvance.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2018.11-Explanation-of-the-Fairness-of-HEVC-Rates.pdf.

[127] Access Advance Closes 2025 with Record Quarter. https://www.afp.com/en/infos/access-advance-closes-2025-record-quarter-eight-major-licensees-100-renewal-rate-litigations.

[128] How exactly do you collect royalty from HEVC licenses?. https://www.reddit.com/r/ffmpeg/comments/p4pspd/how_exactly_do_you_collect_royalty_from_hevc.

[129] Access Advance Extends HEVC Advance Rate Increase. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/access-advance-extends-hevc-advance-010000312.html.

[130] Managing Wi-Fi 6 SEP Licensing and Litigation. https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/11/05/managing-wi-fi-6-sep-licensing-litigation-challenges-10-billion-royalty-market.

[131] Sisvel reveals new Wi-Fi 6 rates and AV1 licensing. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/sisvel-reveals-new-wi-fi-6-rates-and-av1-licensing-progress-sep-regulation.

[132] Who Is Leading the Wi-Fi 6 Patent Race?. https://ipwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Who-is-Leading-the-Wi-Fi-6-Patent-Race-2024.pdf.

[133] Top Patent Sellers of WiFi 6 & WiFi 7 Patents in 2024 - GreyB. https://greyb.com/blog/top-patent-sellers-of-next-generation-wireless-technology-in-2024.

[134] 2026. https://questel-website.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/Patently_100_Wi_Fi_report_2026_fc20386838.pdf.

[135] Standard Essential Patents Guide: FRAND, SEPs &. https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/articles/standard-essential-patents-guide-frand-sep-2025.

[136] 5 in '25: Standard Essential Patents. https://www.fr.com/insights/thought-leadership/blogs/5-in-25-standard-essential-patents.

[137] U.S. SEP Litigation Increases as PAEs Reshape Enforcement. https://www.lexisnexisip.com/resources/us-sep-litigation.

[138] Sisvel Wi-Fi 6 patent pool hits major milestone. https://www.sisvel.com/news/sisvel-wi-fi-6-patent-pool-hits-major-milestone.

[139] Licensing in overlapping 5G🗼and Wi-Fi 6📶Technologies. https://praxtal.com/clashing-signals-licensing-in-overlapping-5g%F0%9F%97%BCand-wi-fi-6%F0%9F%93%B6technologies.

[140] Restricted delivery release for Siemens Industrial 5G. https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/document/109997124/restricted-delivery-release-for-siemens-industrial-5g-infrastructure-v1.2.0-?dti=0&lc=en-us.

[141] Private Industrial 5G Network and 5G Infrastructure V1.2. https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/109997238/PH_Industrial_5G_76_en-US.pdf.

[142] Patently-100-5G-2025.pdf. https://app.patently.com/Patently-100-5G-2025.pdf.

[143] Siemens scales up private 5G infrastructure with expanded. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:80c1385d-77ae-4bf4-9fbe-9a74a2d8a2a6/HQDIPR202501157081EN.pdf.

[144] Betacom and Siemens Unveil Private 5G Network. https://www.drivesandcontrols.ca/latest-articles/betacom-and-siemens-unveil-private-5g-network.

[145] Who is Leading the 5G Patent Race?. https://www.lexisnexisip.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025-LexisNexis-5G-SEP-Report.pdf?hsCtaAttrib=185191375501.

[146] Keysight and Siemens to Demonstrate Performance. https://www.keysight.com/us/en/about/newsroom/news-releases/2025/0304-pr25-038-keysight-and-siemens-to-demonstrate-performance-assurance-of-industrial-5g-networks-at-mobile-world-congress-2025.html.

[147] Private Industrial 5G Network and 5G Infrastructure V1.1. https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/attachments/109987702/PH_Industrial_5G_76.pdf.

[148] Deutsche Messe turns to DT and Siemens for mega 5G. https://www.telecoms.com/5g-6g/deutsche-messe-turns-to-dt-and-siemens-for-mega-5g-campus.

[149] Omdia Market Radar: E2E Private 5G Networks Vendors – 2025. https://omdia.tech.informa.com/om128709/omdia-market-radar-e2e-private-5g-networks-vendors--2025.

[150] Private 5G in 2024: Key growth trends, use cases, and. https://iot-analytics.com/private-5g-2024-key-growth-trends-use-cases-forecast.

[151] EMR Business Review 2024: 5G business for CSPs. https://www.ericsson.com/en/press-releases/2024/2/ericsson-mobility-report-business-review-2024-5g-business-opportunities-for-csps.

[152] Autonomous Manufacturing: Private 5G for Industry 4.0. https://niralnetworks.com/autonomous-manufacturing-how-private-5g-enables-industry-4-0-transformation-in-2025-and-beyond-an-indian-and-global-perspective.

[153] Whatever Happened to the Vaunted Promises of Private. https://www.netscout.com/blog/whatever-happened-vaunted-promises-private-5g-networks.

[154] SEP Licensing Opportunities in Southeast Asia's Growing. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2025/sep-licensing-opportunities-in-southeast-asias-growing-industrial-iot-market.

[155] Private 5G country spotlight. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/private-5g-country-spotlight.pdf.

[156] The Future of Private 5G Networks. https://www.acldigital.com/blogs/private-5g-networks.

[157] Global Private 5G Network Market Research Report. https://www.marknteladvisors.com/research-library/private-5g-network-market.html.

[158] Using IIoT with Private 5G for smart factories. https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2024/9/unlocking-the-promise-of-smart-factories.

[159] Private 5G/4G network deployments in the US (based on. https://www.netmanias.com/en/post/oneshot/16155/4g-lte-5g-private-5g/private-5g-4g-network-deployments-in-the-us-based-on-cbrs-spectrum.

[160] SEP Licensing Opportunities in Southeast Asia's Growing. https://rouse.com/insights/news/2025/sep-licensing-opportunities-in-southeast-asias-growing-industrial-iot-market.

[161] Siemens ranked as a leader in IoT digital platforms for. https://press.siemens.com/global/en/pressrelease/siemens-ranked-leader-iot-digital-platforms-building-operations.

[162] Siemens IIoT featured as a leader in 2024 IDC. https://resources.sw.siemens.com/en-US/analyst-report-siemens-iiot-leader-2024-idc-marketscape-assessment.

[163] SPS 2025: Positioning for Industrial Automation's Future. https://iot-analytics.com/industrial-automation-future-siemens-beckhoff-rockwell-abb-sps-2025.

[164] Siemens unveils breakthrough innovations in industrial AI. https://press.siemens.com/global/en/pressrelease/siemens-unveils-breakthrough-innovations-industrial-ai-and-digital-twin-technology-ces.

[165] Strategic IP Management in the Industrial Sector - GreyB. https://greyb.com/blog/case-study-on-siemens.

[166] Press Releases | News | Siemens China. https://w1.siemens.com.cn/press/NewsDetail_en.aspx?ColumnId=9&ArticleId=21849.

[167] Siemens Named in 2024 Magic Quadrant for Industrial IoT. https://resources.sw.siemens.com/en-US/analyst-report-magic-quadrant-for-industrial-iot-gartner.

[168] The global SEP landscape. https://media.crai.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/24141126/Royalty-Flows-Germany-Final-Report.pdf.

[169] SEP Licensing Opportunities in Southeast Asia's Growing. https://intellectual-property-helpdesk.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/sep-licensing-opportunities-southeast-asias-growing-industrial-iot-market-2025-10-24_en.